University of Rochester
  • BCS Courses
  • Description
  • Syllabus
  • Schedule
  • Archives
  • Blackboard
  • BCSC 206: Lecture Schedule

    Only students who are enrolled in the course may access the course readings online. You must be logged into Blackboard to download these materials.

    Week Date Monday Date Wednesday Notes and to do
    1     08/31 C: General workflow for the rest of the semester. IRB. Ground rules. | pdf
    R: Introduction: What is science? Hypothesis Testing | pdf
    Project assignments
    2 09/05 Labor Day 09/07 E: Background Research & Hypothesis
    demo: cited reference search, journal impact search (Judi Briden, Guest Lecturer)
    C: Project assignments
    Mon: Project preferences due
    Fri: Contact mentor to set up weekly meeting
    Fri: Find weekly time for project teamwork
    3 09/12 C: Oral Presentation Skills | pdf (1st writing assignment given) 09/14 Present Target Study
    Hypothesis & Finding 1
    ­ CITI certification
    ­ Read chosen papers
    4 09/19 Present Target Study
    Hypothesis & Finding 2
    C: Give 1st writing assignment
    R: Replication crisis | pdf
    09/21 Present Brief Background of Target Study Hypothesis (3-5 Articles) ­ be added to IRB protocol
    ­ Read chosen papers
    5 09/26 C: Experimental Design
    discussion: paper assigned, identify design parts | pdf
    09/28 Present Experimental Design of Target Study
    Conditions, timing, num trials, subjects
    9/26 9am: First writing assignment due: Background / previous research
    6 10/03 Present Study Checklist
    Work flow plan, Skills needed, IRB
    10/05 E: Scientific Writing
    Whitney Gegg­Harrison Guest Lecturer
     
    7 10/10 Progress update 10/12; R: Organization (notes, files, code, workflow)
    R/C: Measurement (common paradigms, tools)
    2nd written assignment given (Methods)
    10/14 8pm: Revision due
    8 10/17 Fall Break 10/19 R/C: Graphs & stats  
    9 10/24 Progress update 10/26; R/C: Graphs & stats 10/28 8pm: 2nd assignment due: Methods section
    10 10/31 Progress update 11/02 R/C: Graphs & stats  
    11 11/07 Progress update: preliminary analyses and graphs 11/09 R/C: Graphs & stats 11/11 8pm: revision due
    12 11/14 Progress update: preliminary analyses and graphs 2 11/16 R/C: Graphs & stats  
    13 11/21 Preliminary Final presentation 11/23 THANKSGIVING 11/22 11:59pm: 3rd assignment due: Analysis Plan, Prediction Figures
    14 11/28 R: Replication Crisis/Peer Review Process 11/30 E: Scientific Writing
    Whitney Gegg-Harrison, Guest Lecturer
     
    15 12/05 Progress update: present final data plots 12/07 Final Project Presentation
    Submit all stimuli, code, data, slides
    12/9 8pm: revision due
    16 12/12 Collective writing session: Final essay     Final essay due at 6pm on 12/22

    Readings & Assignments

    8/31 Scientific method & hypothesis testing
    Scientific Method
    Assignment: What is “the scientific method”? What are hypotheses? How can they be tested?
    Optional Advanced Reading:
    Wagenmakers 2007
    Bayesian primer
    9/7 Background research, Project assignments; (IRB approval process)
    **bring computer to class for live demo
    Assignment: After the class, read your assigned paper in detail and spend 30min on background research
    9/12 Presentation Skills
    Presentation Delivery from Brian Scholl, Professor of Psychology at Yale University
    Slide Design from Reynolds, G. (2013). Presentation Zen Design: Simple design principles and techniques to enhance your presentations. New Riders.
    9/14 Target Study, Session 1
    Assignment: Read assigned papers carefully and write down their hypotheses and how they tested them.
    When it’s your turn to present, prepare notes and slides
    9/19 Target Study, Session 2
    Assignment: Read assigned papers carefully and write down their hypotheses and how they tested them.
    When it’s your turn to present, prepare notes and slides
    9/21 Background of target study
    Assignment: Read 3-5 papers related to your target paper and be prepared to summarize them and present them
    9/26 Experiment Design
    Levitin, D. J. (2002). Foundations of Cognitive Psychology: Core readings. Chapter 6: Experimental Design in Psychological Research, pp. 115 - 126. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Discussion Articles:
    Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423(6939), 534-537.
    Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
    Assignment: Identify the independent variables and levels, dependent variables, and within- and between-subjects factors
    9/28 Present design and methods of the target study
    Assignment: Be prepared to present the design and methods of your target study
    Optional discussion topic: Preregistration
    Which parts of each study could have been preregistered? Should preregistration be required for all research? In what ways is a preregistered study more valuable than a non-preregistered study?
    Psychologists Call for Preregistration Open Letter to The Guardian
    Why Psychology Needs Preregistration by Dorothy Bishop
    How to Preregister a Study by Chris Chambers
    Discussion Articles:
    Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (2001). Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science, 12(4), 323-328.
    Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423(6939), 534-537.
    10/3 Study checklist
    Assignment: Be prepared to present your group’s schedule for the rest of the semester (stimuli creation, pilot testing, pilot data analysis, subject testing, and data analysis, presentation). Check with your mentor and make sure the plans are realistic/feasible
    10/5 Scientific Writing
    Assignment: TBD
    10/12 Measurement
    Subtraction Method (read pages 89-101) from Snodgrass, J. G., Levy-Berger, G., & Haydon, M. (1985). Human Experimental Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Optional Advanced Reading
    Model-based Approaches to Neural and Behavioral Data
    10/17 Progress Updates
    Optional discussion topic: Organization
    Organizing computational bio projects Data sharing
    Reproducible computational studies
    10/19 Understanding Results (figures and statistics)
    Ten simple rules for better figures
    Beyond bar and line graphs
    Wallis papers + examples
    Understanding p-values: Wagenmakers 2007
    10/26 Working with Data Output
    Checking Data
    Descriptive Statistics
    What are Outliers
    Detecting Outliers
    Dealing with Missing Data
    Blog Comparison of Database Software
    11/2 Choosing the Right Graphs and Figures
    Ten simple rules for better figures
    Beyond bar and line graphs
    11/9 Statistics
    TBA
    11/16 Statistics
    TBA
    11/28 Replication crises
    Reading of project proposals and superficial reading of associated papers
    The 9 Circles of Scientific Hell
    Ioannidis, J. P. a. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med, 2(8), e124.
    Pashler, H., & Harris, C. (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 531–536. doi:10.1177/1745691612463401
    Assignment: What are the factors contributing to the systematic non-replicability of many studies? What actions can be taken to overcome this problem?
    Optional Advanced Reading:
    Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 528–530.
    Brandt, M. J., Ijzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., … van ’t Veer, A. (2014). The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50(1), 217–224. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005
    Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. a., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. a., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(May). doi:10.1038/nrn3475
    11/30 Scientific Writing & Dissemination
    A Brief Guide to Writing a Psychology Paper -- from Harvard University
    Sternberg, R.J (1993). How to win acceptances by psychology journals: 21 tips for better writing. APS Observer 5, 12-14.
    How to Publish a Replication in Perspectives in Psychological Science